View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Jul 22, 2026 10:47 pm



Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
 New internet rules... 
Author Message
Pillar of the Community
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Coventry
Reply with quote
Quote:
New internet rules come into force this week - here's what will change

Many adult sites currently have simple boxes for users to tick and say they're over 18 - that's no longer good enough, according to Ofcom.


New rules for the internet will start being enforced on Friday, which may well change how you browse.

Ofcom's Children's Codes, a set of regulations designed to protect young people online, will mean sites hosting adult content like pornography will need to have "highly effective" age verification in place.

Social media sites will need to make sure their algorithms aren't pushing harmful content to young people and if their terms and conditions say those kinds of posts aren't allowed, the sites will have to make sure their own rules are properly enforced.

So what's going to change?

The biggest change you'll notice straight away is around age verification.

Many adult sites currently have simple boxes for users to tick and say they're over 18 - that's no longer good enough, according to Ofcom.

Instead, they'll have to properly verify their users' ages before allowing them to see adult content.

So on Friday, users visiting adult websites should be presented with a screen that offers them a few different ways to verify their age.

That could be by checking credit card details, checking ID or by using AI facial age estimation.

This is different to AI facial recognition; whereas facial recognition "recognises" a face by comparing it to an ID or to a database, facial age estimation doesn't attempt to identify the individual.

Instead, it judges faces based on the positions of their features and other ageing traits to estimate how old a user is.

"Facial age estimation is effectively taking a selfie in front of your mobile phone or your laptop, and we capture that image [...] on behalf of the business," Robin Tombs, the chief executive of age estimation company Yoti, told Sky News.

"[The AI] checks 'liveness' to ensure it isn't a photo of somebody older and then estimates the age from that selfie, and then returns an over-18 or under-18 message to the business.

"It then deletes the image."

Every company with adult content on its site is obliged to put these rules into place and Ofcom is willing to "be tough" with non-compliers, according to Jessica Smith, the regulator's online safety principal.

It can impose fines of up to £18m or 10% of revenue and, in very serious cases, stop sites operating in the UK.

Will it actually make a difference?

Plenty of people hope so - the government, Ofcom, children's groups and campaigners are all banking on these new rules to change children's experience on the internet.

"We've had unrestricted access to this content for a generation of children which has had a lot of impacts," Ms Smith told Sky News.

"It is widely accepted that you have to check your age before you can drink alcohol, and so this is a kind of social change as well as a technical one.

"It's about what we, as a society, say is normal for our online experiences. And I think these protections will be important for children in all walks of life."

Source: sky

A system designed by those who have no idea about how things work, but feel they need to be seen to be doing something. Why not force parents to monitor their offspring rather than inconvenience everyone? Incidentally, those that this legislation is designed to prevent accessing 'adult' sites are likely the most adept at circumventing such restrictions.

FWIW, it took me less than 10 seconds to access a site in an earlier trial, and I'm not that internet savvy.

_________________
Of course it'll fit, you just need a bigger hammer.


Tue Jul 22, 2025 1:10 pm
Report this post
Profile
Reply with quote
Post 
Is it not possible to just ban those porn adult sites altogether! people can get hooked on it and surely can only have a negative effect on those who indulge that kind of thing, plus its a waste time and money in peoples lives. I also think they should ban betting on the Internet.
I don't think I am being puritanical here, its just that there are better ways to improve ones use of time and education.


Sat Jul 26, 2025 9:05 am
Report this post
Reply with quote
Post 
Do you connect that this kind of unhealthy, brainless self indulgence which is on the increase along with crime, coincides with the decline in the education system and general moral decline in this country?


Sat Jul 26, 2025 9:13 am
Report this post
Pillar of the Community
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Coventry
Reply with quote
Post 
I guess a blanket ban would have cries of 'Dictator'. 'Nanny state', and the like. My personal view is that (within reason) people should be free to do as they please, but that they must take personal responsibility for their actions.

I think these changes have been brought in largely to 'protect' youngsters from pornography. My response is to make the parents responsible for the monitoring and control of their offspring. Make them be real parents, instead of letting them spend their lives watching trashy reality TV shows, whilst their children get up to all sorts of things.

_________________
Of course it'll fit, you just need a bigger hammer.


Sat Jul 26, 2025 9:26 am
Report this post
Profile
Reply with quote
Post 
rebbonk wrote:
I guess a blanket ban would have cries of 'Dictator'. 'Nanny state', and the like. My personal view is that (within reason) people should be free to do as they please, but that they must take personal responsibility for their actions.

I think these changes have been brought in largely to 'protect' youngsters from pornography. My response is to make the parents responsible for the monitoring and control of their offspring. Make them be real parents, instead of letting them spend their lives watching trashy reality TV shows, whilst their children get up to all sorts of things.


Yes, I know what you mean about people should have the freedom of choice , but it is when it becomes addictive that poses a great problem, which can have a knock on effect for families, especially those online games. Its a bit like those one arm bandit machines in pubs and in casinos. They are all addictive. I have heard now that your winnings on horse racing can now be taxed. In any case there is no fun anymore betting on horses as the races a fixed and the amount you can place a bet on is restricted.. all the excitement of the past with horse racing has gone!


PS.. I am not sure if you can place more money online with horse racing.


Sat Jul 26, 2025 9:37 am
Report this post
Pillar of the Community
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Coventry
Reply with quote
Post 
I don't think betting is taxed these days in the UK. When placing bets, you used to have the choice of paying tax on your wager or of paying tax only if you won, but that was quite a while ago.

Betting limits are often due to what a bookmaker is prepared to expose himself to. If he can lay a large bet off often he'll accept a large wager.

If a bookie won't take your wager because it is too big, you can easily spread several smaller bets around different bookmakers. - These days with internet betting it's even easier than the old telephone betting.

I used to back horses, it was a little fun and I had a very big 66/1 winner just before one Christmas. I quit whilst I was ahead after that!

I used to bet on F1 racing, but gave up when one driver was blatantly told to move over to let a team mate through.

Back to the original story, Sky news asked a few hackers to evaluate the new age checking systems. Every last one found a way round them in a few seconds. - The government should stick to ru(i)ning the country, rather than nannying lazy citizens.

_________________
Of course it'll fit, you just need a bigger hammer.


Sat Jul 26, 2025 6:07 pm
Report this post
Profile
Pillar of the Community
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Coventry
Reply with quote
Post 
There is a very fast growing petition on the government petitions website calling for a reversal of this law. It seems to have hit many hobbyists unintentionally.

_________________
Of course it'll fit, you just need a bigger hammer.


Sat Jul 26, 2025 6:13 pm
Report this post
Profile
Pillar of the Community
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Coventry
Reply with quote
Post 
Just in case anyone wishes to sign the petition...

petition.parliament

246,777 signatures at the time of posting, and with accusations that the act is being used to shut down talk of certain protests being held around the country, I expect it to continue growing. This, to my mind, is an attack on free speech, if we actually ever had any!

_________________
Of course it'll fit, you just need a bigger hammer.


Sun Jul 27, 2025 1:37 am
Report this post
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 8 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.