Topic review - Record Turn outs for Fox Hunts
| Author |
Message |
Madhatter
|
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:28 pm
i'd agree with that abbie, they go on about foxes but kill mice and rats
I've not got involved in the fox hunting debate much because I can see both sides and think those that don't live in the countryside are biased towards saving animals without knowing the ways of the countryside. Foxes have to be controlled somehow, and that just happens to be one of the ways they were controlled.
i'd agree with that abbie, they go on about foxes but kill mice and rats :confused:
I've not got involved in the fox hunting debate much because I can see both sides and think those that don't live in the countryside are biased towards saving animals without knowing the ways of the countryside. Foxes have to be controlled somehow, and that just happens to be one of the ways they were controlled.
|
 |
Abbie
|
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:51 pm
I'm not so sure, many of these so called animal rights protestors seem to have as little regard for animals as the people hunting them. Many of them seem to think it's OK to be cruel to humans bt not animals. Idiots IMHO.
I'm not so sure, many of these so called animal rights protestors seem to have as little regard for animals as the people hunting them. Many of them seem to think it's OK to be cruel to humans bt not animals. Idiots IMHO.
|
 |
Leofric
|
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 8:58 pm
chillitt wrote: did my chickens get a mention?
No, but I can put them in if you want 
[quote="chillitt"]did my chickens get a mention? :( :rolleyes: [/quote]
No, but I can put them in if you want :)
|
 |
Leofric
|
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 8:57 pm
Sarah wrote: Could we read an extract?
If I manage to get it published! (Currently got a 26,000 word novella that is shortlisted for a US horror anthology. That's not about foxes!)
[quote="Sarah"]Could we read an extract? :) [/quote]
If I manage to get it published! (Currently got a 26,000 word novella that is shortlisted for a US horror anthology. That's not about foxes!)
|
 |
chillitt
|
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 8:42 pm
Leofric wrote: Dream on - they're popular because the communities involved are making a stand against the law.
Anyway, it's Labour's only legacy - "We banned fox hunting." (But did bugger all else.)
I've just written a 91,000 novel about foxes.
did my chickens get a mention? 
[quote="Leofric"]Dream on - they're popular because the communities involved are making a stand against the law.
Anyway, it's Labour's only legacy - "We banned fox hunting." (But did bugger all else.)
I've just written a 91,000 novel about foxes.[/quote]
did my chickens get a mention? :( :rolleyes:
|
 |
Sarah
|
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 7:39 pm
Leofric wrote: I've just written a 91,000 novel about foxes.
Could we read an extract? 
[quote="Leofric"] I've just written a 91,000 novel about foxes.[/quote]
Could we read an extract? :)
|
 |
Leofric
|
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 7:35 pm
ronlyre wrote: I would have thought the reason for the big public turnouts at the Boxing day hunts was obvious. The people/the public are pleased to watch the spectacle now that they know the hunts are towing the line (geddit?) and using other methods to get their kicks, other than ripping a fox apart.
Dream on - they're popular because the communities involved are making a stand against the law.
Anyway, it's Labour's only legacy - "We banned fox hunting." (But did bugger all else.)
I've just written a 91,000 novel about foxes.
[quote="ronlyre"]I would have thought the reason for the big public turnouts at the Boxing day hunts was obvious. The people/the public are pleased to watch the spectacle [i]now that they know [/i]the hunts are towing the line (geddit?) and using other methods to get their kicks, other than ripping a fox apart.[/quote]
Dream on - they're popular because the communities involved are making a stand against the law.
Anyway, it's Labour's only legacy - "We banned fox hunting." (But did bugger all else.)
I've just written a 91,000 novel about foxes.
|
 |
JohnnyG
|
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:36 pm
I agree with Reggie it is a natural reaction. Unfortunately it also comes down to the fact that no publicity is bad publicity.
I agree with Reggie it is a natural reaction. Unfortunately it also comes down to the fact that no publicity is bad publicity.
|
 |
ronlyre
|
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:52 pm
Big turnouts.
I would have thought the reason for the big public turnouts at the Boxing day hunts was obvious.
The people/the public are pleased to watch the spectacle now that they know the hunts are towing the line (geddit?) and using other methods to get their kicks, other than ripping a fox apart.
I would have thought the reason for the big public turnouts at the Boxing day hunts was obvious.
The people/the public are pleased to watch the spectacle [i]now that they know [/i]the hunts are towing the line (geddit?) and using other methods to get their kicks, other than ripping a fox apart.
|
 |
Reggie
|
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:05 pm
I think it's a natural reaction to a knee jerk response by the government. Pity they didn't give such a decisive response when far more people didn't want to go to war with Iraq. 
I think it's a natural reaction to a knee jerk response by the government. Pity they didn't give such a decisive response when far more people didn't want to go to war with Iraq. :(
|
 |
Will
|
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 1:30 pm
Record Turn outs for Fox Hunts
Personally, I'm neutral as to the whole hunting debate. I'd never ever want to take part in it, but it's never actively try and prevent others from doing it either. The interesting thing is, that since the ban on fox hunting with hounds, there have been record turn outs for the sport which carries on using loopholes found in the legislation! I'd speculate that this is an act of defiance by Joe Public. Or is there another reason?
Personally, I'm neutral as to the whole hunting debate. I'd never ever want to take part in it, but it's never actively try and prevent others from doing it either. The interesting thing is, that since the ban on fox hunting with hounds, there have been record turn outs for the sport which carries on using loopholes found in the legislation! I'd speculate that this is an act of defiance by Joe Public. Or is there another reason?
|
 |
|
|