Warwickshire Online Chat Forum
http://warwickshireonline.com/

New Theatre & Walkbridge
http://warwickshireonline.com/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=76		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  Sandman [ Thu Mar 23, 2006 1:19 pm ]
Post subject:  New Theatre & Walkbridge
Is anyone else worried by this?

I admit the current theatre is pretty ugly in places, and definitely needs changing, but I'm very concerned about the kinds of monstrosities that Stratford Council is capable of dreaming up. I'm sure they are more then capable of creating something as hideous as the giant silver handbag now residing in Birmingham's Bull ring.

Now only that but they want to spend £2 million on a bridge to nowhere! We have enough bridges already, and unless they plan on building another stone bridge, I'm sure it will spoil the open look of the river. Not only that but it will be putting one of Stratford's oldest institutions out of business, the ferry which has diligently taken people across the river for decades.
Author:  Abbie [ Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:23 pm ]
Post subject: 
You do raise a good point, where they want the bridge to reach is just a very large field of grass. Seems a rather wasteful way of blowing two million pounds.
Author:  Will [ Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:18 pm ]
Post subject: 
I know what you mean, there seems to be a huge trend for councils to commission the most "trendy" design that comes their way. Which would be fine if the building wasn't surrounded by Tudor houses. I agree that anything other then a stone bridge is most likely going to look hideously out of place.

Another thing I can't stand is art for art's sake, it's everywhere now! When so many statues and modern memorials of various kinds, are stuffed into every spare nook and cranny, they all lose their iconic value. That's all just my opinion of course. :)
Author:  paul2006 [ Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:42 pm ]
Post subject: 
why not build a ramp on one side of the river, then all the boy racers can have a go at jumping the river in their sooped up Nova's. If they don't make it, the car is crushed! :p
Author:  Sandman [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 8:41 pm ]
Post subject: 
Even better, we could make the bridge out of their cars. :)

I've heard today that the bridge is going to be designed by the winner of a competition in France???? If this is true it is an utter disgrace, not only do we not get any say in how our money is spent, we don't even get to have any input into what it looks like!
Author:  Will [ Thu Jul 06, 2006 8:54 am ]
Post subject: 
I'm pretty sure so many people don't want this bridge, I'm thinking of starting an online petition (something we can now do with the new host). It's highly unfair that people's opinions seem to be getting ignored.
Author:  chillitt [ Thu Jul 06, 2006 10:28 pm ]
Post subject: 
but if they dont build the bridge, how will the theatre types get to the new wine bars shops and cafés that will be built on the other side? :rolleyes:
Author:  Will [ Fri Jul 07, 2006 11:46 am ]
Post subject: 
Didn't know they had any plans for any, but I suspect they could probably just use one of the three bridges & ferry we already have.
Author:  Will [ Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:27 pm ]
Post subject: 
I've been following this story, and it seems in-spite of increasing opposition, the powers at be, are showing no signs of backing down. The 'World Class Stratford' project seems to becoming increasingly under fire.
Author:  Sandman [ Wed Aug 16, 2006 6:47 pm ]
Post subject: 
Heh, tell me about it. World class Stratford is a joke, look at the new office block that's been built by the leisure center, which is now affectionately known by locals as 'Stratford Prison'.
Author:  Will [ Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:37 pm ]
Post subject: 
There's a news article available about this now.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/coventry_warwickshire/4797635.stm
Author:  Will [ Thu Aug 17, 2006 6:32 am ]
Post subject: 
Well I saw the design proposals for the bridge this morning. One of them looks no better then the walkways you see spanning motorways, and at least two of them clash hidiously with surrounding area. There are two which are in fact quite nice designs, one even has a few natural materials such as wood.

They all have one thing in common though, they all utterly destroy the scenic view many of us know and love. I really must get in touch with James Phillpotts and see if he and Stratford Voice can make use of this forum.
Author:  Will [ Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:58 pm ]
Post subject: 
I've just made good on that; just had a very interesting conversation with James Phillpotts regarding this issue. I won't go into details though, as I'm hoping he will be able to do so himself before long. His response to the idea of the site was very encouraging, and I think we may be able to help each other out.

I won't say any more then that until he gets back to me next Tuesday.
Author:  Milly [ Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:44 am ]
Post subject: 
I thinks it's awful that they could even consider destroying such a wonderful stretch of the river. They have three bridges going across the river already, why do they need another one?

It will be one of the biggest mistakes ever, and they won't be able to reverse it. I really hope they see sense, and don't destroy this beautiful stretch of river.
Author:  Madhatter [ Sat Aug 19, 2006 2:56 am ]
Post subject: 
I saw this earlier on narrowboatworld.com They seem to be asking which design, and aren't asking if it's wanted in the first place. All of those designs are awfull anyway, whats wrong with a traditional stone or brick bridge. Although I suppose that would create a wall where as a metal bridge is more transparent because it's less solid.
Consultation plans to knock theatres down, 2 million pounds on a bridge, county council really have lost the plot now, and yet again it's south county getting the money. Why don't they spend it on pedestrianizing the town centre here, we're being choked by cars.
Author:  Will [ Sat Aug 19, 2006 11:34 am ]
Post subject: 
I remember years ago, they had grand schemes to pedestrianise Bridge street, it never materialised though. It seems a safe assumption that the real reason for the bridge is for better access to the car park. I've also head people speculating that all the open land on that opposite side of the river, would make great retail and housing land. Not only would we lose the beauty of the river, we'd lose all that open green land too. I hope at least it's just speculation.
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/